Internet Losers

Mediacheck Canadians Just Became World’s Biggest Internet Losers is a sweet article on UBB published by The Tyee.  A version of it also appeared in the Globe and Mail yesterday.

Posted in Technology, Usage Based Billing | Leave a comment

TekSavvy’s reaction to CRTC 2011-44

TekSavvy (my ISP) have released the following press release in reaction to yesterdays idiotic CRTC descision on UBB:

TekSavvy Responds To CRTC Decision on Internet User Fees

Chatham, Ontario January 25, 2011-  TekSavvy Solutions Inc., one of Canada’s leading independent internet service providers, reacted with disappointment to the decision handed down by the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission(CRTC)today on usage based billing(UBB) of internet services. The result of the decision imposes limits on the ability to best serve its customers and provide an effective competitive alternative to the telecos like Bell which dominate the internet service market.

“We are discouraged by the decision by the CRTC to force us to charge virtually the same amount to our customers for the bandwidth they use that Bell does,” said Rocky Gaudrault, TekSavvy CEO. “This essentially gives the opportunity for incumbents like Bell, at zero cost, to increase their margins and stifle competition. If Bell wants to charge an economically unjustifiable amount for downloading to its customers, that is their business. However, we should not be forced to do the same. In the decision we asked for a discount of 50% to give us flexibility in serving our customers, but the CRTC limited the discount to 15%, so we are essentially stuck with pricing that serves Bell’s interests, but no one else’s.”

UBB is an increasingly controversial “tax” on downloading virtually unique to Canada, which makes consumers pay artificially high amounts for downloading to discourage bandwidth usage. TekSavvy and businesses like it buy their bandwidth from telecos and cable companies at wholesale rates stipulated by the CRTC which are supposed to allow TekSavvy and others to compete, and at the same time compensate the suppliers like Bell fairly.

“We would understand the sensitivity to the discount if Bell had a significant cost for each incremental gigabyte that users download, but they don’t,” said Mr. Gaudrault.  “The ostensible, theoretical reason behind UBB is to conserve capacity, but that issue is very questionable. One certain result though, that Bell will make much more profit on its internet service, and discourage Canadians from watching TV and movies on the internet instead of CTV, which Bell now owns.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CRTC 2011-44

Broad Band Reports already has 6 pages of discussion revolving around today’s UBB decision.

In Quebec 30 days notice must be given before a price change, so that means that the GAS ISPs are going to have to announce their pricing plans by this weekend.  I know that Bell resellers in Quebec will be getting a 60Gig/month cap, but I’m still not sure whether Ontario will also have a 60Gig cap or a 25Gig cap (like Bell requested).  I also know that there’s a $30 limit on overage charges if the user uses less than 300Gigs, so this should allow GAS ISPs to sell blocks of bandwidth…

Right now I’m paying for a $28 basic phone line (which I don’t really need) from Bell…  so I think I’m going to cancel that in favor of a dry loop and I’ll apply the $20 (the dry loop is $8) I save to the overage charges.

Also OpenMedia.ca have released a statement related to the CRTC decision.  Please sign their petition if you haven’t already done so.

Posted in Technology, Usage Based Billing | Leave a comment

The CRTC Rules Wrong

So UBB is here, must be implemented by March 1, and will only allow for a wholesaler discount of 15%… There’s got to be a way to fight this!

Here’s the CRTC’s decision on the UBB implementation:

Commission’s analysis and determinations

9.      The Commission notes that carriers’ retail UBB rates are market-based and are not subject to prior Commission approval – that is, they are forborne from regulation. The Commission also notes that the flat-rate component of the carriers’ retail Internet service rates recovers most, if not all, of the associated retail UBB costs. In the Commission’s view, this situation provides carriers with the flexibility to adjust or waive retail UBB rates on a promotional basis.

10.  However, the Commission considers that, for competitors, carriers’ wholesale UBB rates are an additional, direct, and unavoidable cost that competitors will need to recover from rates paid by their retail customers. The Commission also considers that wholesale UBB charges will result in additional customer care costs for competitors, including a review of the relevant carrier’s wholesale usage records and associated UBB charges.

11.  Further, the Commission notes its view in Telecom Regulatory Policy 2010-632 that services provided by smaller competitors bring pricing discipline, innovation, and consumer choice to the retail Internet service market. The Commission considers that, in the absence of a discount on carriers’ wholesale UBB rates relative to their comparable retail UBB rates, smaller competitors’ ability to continue to differentiate their retail Internet services would be unduly impaired.

12.  In light of the above, the Commission concludes that wholesale UBB rates should be established at a discount relative to carriers’ comparable retail UBB rates and that, in the absence of such a discount, the wholesale UBB rates would not be just and reasonable, contrary to subsection 27(1) of the Telecommunications Act (the Act).

13.  Regarding the amount of the wholesale UBB discount, the Commission considers that if it is too large, the effectiveness of UBB as an economic ITMP will be reduced, while if it is too small, competitors’ capacity to recover costs will be undermined.

14.  The Commission concludes that a discount of 15 percent for carriers’ wholesale UBB rates relative to their retail UBB rates recognizes these considerations appropriately.

Implementation

15.  CNOC requested a minimum period of 90 days for implementation. The Bell companies submitted that implementation of the determinations in this decision must not delay the implementation of wholesale UBB rates as set out in Telecom Decision 2010-802. The Bell companies also submitted that they would require 60 days from the date of this decision to implement any required changes to their billing systems.

16.  The Commission notes that wholesale UBB rates were approved for the Bell companies in Telecom Decision 2010-255, which was issued on 6 May 2010. The Commission considers that wholesale UBB rates for GAS should be implemented by the Bell companies without undue delay. The Commission considers that the Bell companies’ proposed period for the implementation of discounted wholesale UBB rates is unduly long.

17.  Accordingly, the Commission directs the Bell companies, as well as cable carriers with tariffed UBB rates for TPIA services, to implement discounted wholesale UBB rates on the basis set out in this decision, by 1 March 2011. The Commission further directs carriers whose wholesale tariffs contain UBB rates to issue revised tariffs reflecting the determinations in this decision, by 1 March 2011.

You can see the full text of it here: Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-44

Posted in Technology, Usage Based Billing | Leave a comment

Stop the Meter: Stop Usage Based Billing

If you haven’t signed OpenMedia.ca‘s “Stop the Meter” petition please consider doing so:

Here’s a report on UBB by CBC:

Posted in Technology, Usage Based Billing | Leave a comment